Managed service companies and the 2007 MSC rules
The composite company market that grew up after IR35, the managed service company legislation of April 2007 that shut it, and the rules' reach into contractor accountancy today.
2002–2013
REVIEWED 2026-09-05
A managed service company is one through which a worker provides services and receives most of the payment for them, but which is run by a provider rather than by the worker. The structure grew up after IR35: a provider set up companies in bulk, placed contractors in them as nominal shareholders and directors, and paid them through low salaries and dividends, with the IR35 question left to a rule HMRC could not enforce against thousands of companies at once. By 2006 the composite company market ran to tens of thousands of workers.
The 2007 legislation
The Treasury published Tackling Managed Service Companies with the December 2006 Pre-Budget Report, consulted until March 2007, and legislated in the Finance Act 2007 with effect from 6 April 2007. Where a company is a managed service company, everything paid to the worker is employment income: the IR35 test of the hypothetical contract no longer applies. Unpaid PAYE can be transferred from the company to its directors, to the provider and its directors, and from January 2008 to any other person who encouraged or facilitated the arrangement, which was designed to reach the agencies and clients that used them.
What happened
The composite providers moved their workers into umbrella employment or individual limited companies within weeks. The umbrella market took most of them, and the market for contractor accountancy that served individual companies took the rest. The archive's coverage from December 2006 through 2007 records the consultation, the industry's objections to the width of the definition, the concession for professional advisers and the transition.
The involvement test today
The rule turns on whether a provider is involved with the company: promoting the structure, influencing how payments are made, benefiting financially from the worker's services, or providing insurance against the tax rules. A person providing accountancy or legal services is not involved merely by doing so, but the line between advising and running the company has never been drawn clearly. HMRC's actions from 2022 against contractors served by particular accountancy firms, on the argument that the firm's involvement made every client company a managed service company, revived a rule the industry thought settled. The Freelancer and Contractor Services Association asked the Chancellor in its 2026 Budget submission to rewrite it.
Reading the archive
The articles below run from the composite company boom, through the consultation and the April 2007 commencement, to the accountancy cases of recent years.
- 11 JAN 2013Government reveals significant increase in MSC tax investigationsThe Government has stepped up its use of the Managed Service Companies (MSC) legislation to recover tax and National Insurance in the past year.BUSINESS
- 21 NOV 2011MSC enforcement brings in £6 millionCompliance activity by HM Revenue and Customs relating to the enforcement of the Managed Service Company Legislation has now raised close to £6…BUSINESS
- 20 OCT 2011Debt transfer risk on agency workers' rightsEnd users and recruiters who influence agency workers to operate via personal service companies to attempt to avoid the Agency Workers Regulations…BUSINESS
- 27 JUN 2007MSCs: HMRC could clampdown on 'accountants'Managed service company providers (MSCs) who continue to provide services to one man limited companies by claiming to be 'professional accountants'…POLITICS
- 10 APR 2007MSC rules take effect as composite providers scramble into umbrellasThe managed service company legislation came into force on 6 April, and the sector it was designed to shut has spent the first days of the new tax…IR35
- 15 MAR 2007MSCs: Two wrongs don't make a rightThe respected professional bodies, including the Institute of Chartered Accountants, have been united in their condemnation of the Government's…VIEWPOINT
- 20 FEB 2007Managed service company consultation closes with the industry braced for AprilThe consultation on the Treasury's plan to tax managed service company workers as employees closes early next month, and the shape of the responses…POLITICS
- 30 JAN 2007MSCs: Using a sledge hammer to miss the nut?The Government's attempt to crack down on Managed Service Companies (MSCs) has been the subject of much debate and discussion - but will they…VIEWPOINT
- 8 AUG 2006Call to end confusion over self-employed statusThe Treasury should act urgently to clarify what it means by self-employment and sort out the current muddle over the status of managed service…BUSINESS
- 23 MAR 2006Budget (6): Should contractors beware? - QdosA couple of lines in the Budget documentation have signalled that 'managed service company schemes' will be reviewed as the Chancellor linked them…POLITICS
- 22 MAR 2006Budget (4): Managed service company reviewThe Chancellor issued a warning to small businesses who 'incorporate in order to avoid tax' and announced that it will 'consult on action to tackle…POLITICS
- 11 JUL 2005Recovery of tax and NI from individualIn a reply to a posting "Composites and liability", Barry Roback advises the Revenue can pursue the individual personally in the event that the…ASK THE EXPERTS
- 29 DEC 2004Revenue warns composite companies on NIC and travelEarly in December I wrote that the Inland Revenue were about to issue a tax bulletin that would include guidance aimed mainly at contractors working…BUSINESS
- 2 NOV 2004Composite Companies and IR35To summarise, in his question Paul Reynolds asks which is safer with regards to IR35, working through a composite company or having your own limited…ASK THE EXPERTS
- 15 JUL 2003Composite company claimsgiant, a firm which develops managed solutions for freelancers, has advised freelancers that they are better off operating through a composite…IR35
- 16 DEC 2002Gabem Group composite company for contractorsProvides composite companies Claims "The Gabem Group provides a personalised accounting and administration service that enables temporary workers to…BUSINESS
- 4 DEC 2002Do composite companies really protect their contractors from IR35?A reader questions arrangements paying the statutory minimum wage plus weekly dividends, arguing the dividends represent remuneration for services…ASK THE EXPERTS
- 14 NOV 2002Expert analysis: Isle of Man IR35 avoidance strategy flawedA tax expert at independent tax consultancy firm WJB Chiltern has provided an analysis of a structure, currently being marketed as an IR35 avoidance…CONFERENCE PAPERS
- 13 NOV 2002Composite Companies: Should you use them?In light of the recent problems with Contranet and CFP/Dignatio I have republished an article written by Lawyer Simon Hewes, published on the…BUSINESS
- 19 AUG 2002'We're watching you' Revenue tells composite companiesThe Inland Revenue's latest tax bulletin has issued a warning to composite companies, set up to remove the threat of IR35 for contractors.IR35
